Dossier de preuve de méthode

Democratic Norms Support Measurement

This approach measures how committed ordinary citizens are to democratic norms by observing the price they are willing to pay to uphold them. Rather than asking abstractly whether people value democracy, Matthew Graham and Milan Svolik's 2020 candidate-choice design confronts voters with a co-partisan candidate who violates a democratic principle and estimates how much electoral support that violation costs. Their finding that most Americans will tolerate undemocratic behavior by their own side when partisanship and policy stakes are high reframed the study of democratic backsliding around revealed, not professed, commitment. Christopher Claassen's parallel work links aggregate diffuse support for democracy to whether democracies survive.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Dossier source

Citations copiées telles quelles du dossier source de la méthode. Aucune vérification au niveau de la revendication n'en est déduite.

Measuring Mass Support for Democratic Norms (Candidate-Choice Tradeoff Design)

Dossier de méthode taxonomique · process-pipeline / political-psychology

Ouvrir la méthode complète

Revendications organisées

Revendications enregistrées dans le registre de preuves, chacune avec sa propre évaluation.

Pas encore de revendications organisées

Cette vue n'invente pas d'évaluation de revendication lorsque le registre n'en contient aucune.

Méthodes apparentées

Généré à partir du graphe de méthodes et présenté comme des relations suggérées par la machine — aucune revendication de preuve n'est déduite.

Same method familyElite Cue Experimentmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyPolitical Trust Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainSupport for Political Violence Measuremachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.