Dossier de preuve de méthode

Controversy Mapping

Controversy mapping is a descriptive method for exploring and representing socio-technical disputes while they are still open and unsettled, before they harden into accepted facts or stable technologies. Developed as a teaching practice by Bruno Latour and codified by Tommaso Venturini at the Sciences Po médialab, it asks the analyst to dive into the heat of a debate, follow the actors and their arguments without prematurely taking sides, and render the resulting complexity legible through maps and visualisations. It treats controversy not as a pathology to be resolved but as the privileged moment in which the social and the technical are visibly being assembled.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Dossier source

Citations copiées telles quelles du dossier source de la méthode. Aucune vérification au niveau de la revendication n'en est déduite.

Controversy Mapping (Cartography of Scientific Controversies)

Dossier de méthode taxonomique · process-pipeline / science-technology-studies

Ouvrir la méthode complète

Revendications organisées

Revendications enregistrées dans le registre de preuves, chacune avec sa propre évaluation.

Pas encore de revendications organisées

Cette vue n'invente pas d'évaluation de revendication lorsque le registre n'en contient aucune.

Méthodes apparentées

Généré à partir du graphe de méthodes et présenté comme des relations suggérées par la machine — aucune revendication de preuve n'est déduite.

Same method familyActor-Network Theory Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyBoundary-Work Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySocial Construction of Technologymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySociotechnical Imaginaries Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.