The Toulmin Model of Argument
Toulmin's model diagrams the functional parts of an everyday argument—claim, data, warrant, backing, qualifier, and rebuttal—as an alternative to formal logic.
Definition
The Toulmin model is a scheme for analyzing arguments by their functional components—claim, data (grounds), warrant, backing, qualifier, and rebuttal—rather than by formal logical structure.
Scope
This topic covers Stephen Toulmin's layout of argument from The Uses of Argument. It treats the six functional elements he distinguishes, his thesis that the criteria for sound argument are field-dependent, and the model's wide adoption in rhetoric, composition, and communication. The model's relationship to syllogistic logic and its pedagogical applications are included.
Core questions
- What functional roles do the parts of an argument play?
- How does a warrant license the move from data to claim?
- Why does Toulmin hold that argument standards are field-dependent?
- How does the layout improve on the syllogism for real arguments?
Key concepts
- claim
- data (grounds)
- warrant
- backing
- qualifier
- rebuttal
- field-dependence
Key theories
- The layout of argument
- Toulmin distinguishes the claim being argued, the data supporting it, the warrant licensing the inference, the backing for the warrant, a qualifier expressing strength, and possible rebuttals, modeling how reasoning actually proceeds.
History
Toulmin, a philosopher trained at Cambridge, published The Uses of Argument in 1958 as a critique of formal logic's adequacy for practical reasoning. Though initially received coolly by logicians, the layout was embraced by American speech-communication and composition scholars in the 1960s and 1970s, becoming a standard teaching tool. Toulmin later elaborated it in An Introduction to Reasoning.
Debates
- Field-dependence versus universal standards
- Toulmin's claim that the substance of good argument varies by field has been read as a challenge to universal logical norms; critics ask whether this collapses into relativism or simply recognizes domain-specific evidence.
Key figures
- Stephen Toulmin
- Richard Rieke
- Allan Janik
Related topics
Seminal works
- toulmin2003
Frequently asked questions
- What is a warrant in the Toulmin model?
- A warrant is the often-implicit general principle that licenses moving from the data to the claim. Where data answer 'what have you got to go on?', the warrant answers 'how do you get there?'