Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Nollatäytteinen malli× | Hurdle-mallin laskentadatalle× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Tilastotiede | Tilastotiede |
| Menetelmäperhe | Regression model | Regression model |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1992 | 1986 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Diane Lambert | Mullahy |
| Tyyppi≠ | Count regression with excess zeros | Two-part count model |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Lambert, D. (1992). Zero-inflated Poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics, 34(1), 1–14. DOI ↗ | Mullahy, J. (1986). Specification and Testing of Some Modified Count Data Models. Journal of Econometrics, 33(3), 341–365. DOI ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | ZIP model, ZINB model, zero-inflated Poisson, zero-inflated negative binomial | hurdle count model, two-part count model, zero-truncated count model, Engel Modeli (Hurdle Model) |
| Liittyvät≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | A zero-inflated model is a two-component mixture regression designed for count outcomes that contain more zero values than a standard Poisson or negative binomial distribution can accommodate. One component is a binary process that generates structural zeros; the other is a count process that generates both zeros and positive counts. | The hurdle model is a two-part count-data model introduced by Mullahy (1986). A first stage models the binary choice of crossing a hurdle (a zero versus a non-zero count), and a second stage models the strictly positive counts with a zero-truncated distribution such as a zero-truncated Poisson or negative binomial. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|