Vertaile menetelmiä

	Institutional Venn Diagram	Matrix Scoring and Ranking
Tieteenala	Anthropology	Anthropology
Menetelmäperhe	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Syntyvuosi	1994	1994
Kehittäjä	Participatory Rural Appraisal tradition (Robert Chambers and colleagues)	Participatory Rural Appraisal tradition (Robert Chambers and colleagues)
Tyyppi	Participatory diagram of local institutions sized and positioned by importance and closeness	Participatory scoring of options against locally generated criteria in a matrix
Alkuperäislähde	Chambers, R. (1994). The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development, 22(7), 953–969.	Chambers, R. (1994). The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development, 22(7), 953–969.
Rinnakkaisnimet	Chapati Diagram, Institutional Relationship Diagram, Venn Diagramming, Organizational Mapping	Matrix Scoring, Preference Matrix, Pairwise and Matrix Ranking, Criteria Scoring Matrix
Liittyvät	4	4
Tiivistelmä	An institutional Venn diagram, often called a chapati or relationship diagram, is a participatory rural appraisal tool in which community members represent the organizations and institutions in their lives as circles and arrange them to show importance and relationships. The size of each circle reflects how important or influential the institution is, and its position — how far from the community and how much it overlaps with other circles — shows how close and how connected it is. The finished diagram is a community-drawn map of its institutional landscape and the social distance between people and the bodies that affect them.	Matrix scoring and ranking is a participatory rural appraisal tool in which community members evaluate a set of options — crop varieties, services, trees, livestock breeds, sources of water — against criteria they themselves generate, arranged as a matrix. Options run along one axis and criteria along the other, and participants score each cell, typically by placing a number of counters such as seeds or stones to show how well an option performs on that criterion. Summing the scores across criteria produces a ranking of the options that reflects the community's own values and priorities.