ScholarGate
Avustaja

Vertaile menetelmiä

Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.

Aika-viipaloitu kartoituskatsaus×Kartoittava katsaus – Näytön ja kirjallisuuden kartoittava katsaus×
TieteenalaScientometriikkaScientometriikka
MenetelmäperheProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Syntyvuosi2000s–2010sLate 1990s–2000s; major methodological formalization ~2010s
KehittäjäCampbell Collaboration / Gough, Oliver & ThomasBuckland & Gann (1998); formalized by systematic review community (Campbell Collaboration, Collaboration for Environmental Evidence)
TyyppiEvidence synthesis with temporal segmentationSystematic evidence mapping methodology
AlkuperäislähdeGough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). An Introduction to Systematic Reviews. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1849204842James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 7. DOI ↗
Rinnakkaisnimettemporal mapping review, time-period mapping review, longitudinal evidence map, chronological mapping reviewevidence map, systematic map, research map, literature map
Liittyvät66
TiivistelmäA time-sliced mapping review is a systematic evidence synthesis that partitions the search period into discrete temporal segments — such as five-year intervals — and constructs a separate evidence map for each slice. By comparing maps across periods, researchers can chart how topics emerge, peak, decline, or transform within a research field, producing a longitudinal picture of knowledge structure that a single-point mapping review cannot provide.A mapping review (also called a systematic map or evidence map) is a form of systematic review that aims to chart the extent, range, and nature of evidence on a broad topic rather than synthesize findings into a single pooled answer. It categorizes studies by key dimensions — such as intervention type, population, outcome, and study design — and presents the resulting landscape visually and tabularly so that researchers and practitioners can identify clusters of evidence, knowledge gaps, and priorities for future primary research or deeper synthesis.
ScholarGateAineisto
  1. v1
  2. 2 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED

Siirry hakuun Lataa diat

ScholarGateVertaile menetelmiä: Time-sliced Mapping review · Mapping Review. Haettu 2026-06-18 osoitteesta https://scholargate.app/fi/compare