Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Technography× | Actor-Network Theory Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Science Technology Studies | Science Technology Studies |
| Menetelmäperhe | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 2011 | 1984 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Kees Jansen & Sietze Vellema (Wageningen); algorithmic strand by Taina Bucher | Bruno Latour, Michel Callon, John Law |
| Tyyppi≠ | Ethnographic field method | Material-semiotic theory and analytic method |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Jansen, K., & Vellema, S. (2011). What is technography? NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 57(3-4), 169-177. DOI ↗ | Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199256051 |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | Ethnography of technology-in-use, Technographic analysis, Algorithmic technography | ANT analysis, Sociology of translation, Actant-network mapping |
| Liittyvät | 4 | 4 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | Technography is the ethnographic description of technology-in-use: how tools, machines, and systems are actually handled, skilled, and enacted in the course of real tasks. Articulated as a method by Kees Jansen and Sietze Vellema in the Wageningen tradition of agrarian and development studies, it places the technical at the centre of ethnographic attention, asking how people and artefacts together accomplish work. A digital strand, exemplified by Taina Bucher's study of algorithmic power, extends technography to software and platforms, examining how algorithms are encountered, felt, and acted upon. Across both, the method treats technology not as a finished object but as something performed in practice within particular social and material settings. | Actor-Network Theory analysis treats society and technology as a single woven fabric, mapping how heterogeneous human and non-human actors—engineers, scallops, documents, machines, regulators—are linked into networks through a process of translation. Rather than explaining technical outcomes by appeal to pre-given social categories, ANT follows the actors themselves and describes how durable arrangements are assembled, stabilised, and sometimes undone. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|