ScholarGate
Avustaja

Vertaile menetelmiä

Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.

Spatiaalinen kaksoisrobustinen estimointi×Propensity Score Matching×
TieteenalaKausaalipäättelyTutkimuksen tilastomenetelmät
MenetelmäperheRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Syntyvuosi2010s–2020s1983
KehittäjäExtension of Robins, Rotnitzky & Zhao (1994) doubly robust framework to spatial settings; developed in spatial epidemiology and econometrics literaturePaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TyyppiSemiparametric causal estimatorMethod
AlkuperäislähdePapadogeorgou, G., Mealli, F., & Zigler, C. M. (2019). Causal inference with interfering units for cluster and population level treatment allocation programs. Biometrics, 75(3), 778-787. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
RinnakkaisnimetSpatial DR, Spatial AIPW, Spatial augmented IPW, Doubly robust spatial causal estimationPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Liittyvät53
TiivistelmäSpatial doubly robust estimation is a semiparametric causal inference method that combines propensity score weighting with outcome regression modeling — providing protection against misspecification of either component — while explicitly accounting for spatial autocorrelation among units. It extends the classical augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW) estimator to settings where treatment assignment and outcomes are geographically clustered or spatially dependent.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateAineisto
  1. v1
  2. 2 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED

Siirry hakuun Lataa diat

ScholarGateVertaile menetelmiä: Spatial Doubly Robust Estimation · Propensity Score Matching. Haettu 2026-06-17 osoitteesta https://scholargate.app/fi/compare