Vertaile menetelmiä

	Spatiaalinen kaksoisrobustinen estimointi	Käänteisen todennäköisyyden painotus (IPW / IPTW)
Tieteenala	Kausaalipäättely	Kausaalipäättely
Menetelmäperhe	Regression model	Regression model
Syntyvuosi	2010s–2020s	2000
Kehittäjä	Extension of Robins, Rotnitzky & Zhao (1994) doubly robust framework to spatial settings; developed in spatial epidemiology and econometrics literature	Robins, Hernán & Brumback
Tyyppi	Semiparametric causal estimator	Causal inference weighting estimator
Alkuperäislähde	Papadogeorgou, G., Mealli, F., & Zigler, C. M. (2019). Causal inference with interfering units for cluster and population level treatment allocation programs. Biometrics, 75(3), 778-787.	Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560.
Rinnakkaisnimet	Spatial DR, Spatial AIPW, Spatial augmented IPW, Doubly robust spatial causal estimation	IPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting
Liittyvät	5	5
Tiivistelmä	Spatial doubly robust estimation is a semiparametric causal inference method that combines propensity score weighting with outcome regression modeling — providing protection against misspecification of either component — while explicitly accounting for spatial autocorrelation among units. It extends the classical augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW) estimator to settings where treatment assignment and outcomes are geographically clustered or spatially dependent.	Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias.