ScholarGate
Avustaja

Vertaile menetelmiä

Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.

Ohjelmistokompleksisuusmittarit×Defect Prediction Model×
TieteenalaOhjelmistotekniikkaOhjelmistotekniikka
MenetelmäperheProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Syntyvuosi19762005
KehittäjäThomas J. McCabeThomas Ostrand, Elaine Weyuker, Robert Bell
Tyyppiquantitative measurementmachine learning model
AlkuperäislähdeMcCabe, T. J. (1976). A complexity measure. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2(4), 308–320. DOI ↗Ostrand, T. J., Weyuker, E. J., & Bell, R. M. (2005). Predicting the location and number of faults in large software systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31(4), 340–355. DOI ↗
Rinnakkaisnimetcode complexity analysis, complexity measurementfault prediction, bug prediction, defect classification
Liittyvät44
TiivistelmäSoftware complexity metrics quantify the structural and operational difficulty of code through numerical measurements. Introduced by Thomas McCabe in 1976, cyclomatic complexity became the foundational approach. These metrics assess maintainability, testability, and defect risk, enabling teams to identify problematic code regions and guide refactoring efforts.Defect prediction models forecast the likelihood of software faults in code modules using statistical or machine learning approaches. Pioneered by Ostrand, Weyuker, and Bell (2005), these models correlate code metrics (complexity, churn, coupling) with historical defect data to identify high-risk components. Organizations use predictions to allocate testing resources, guide code review, and prioritize refactoring.
ScholarGateAineisto
  1. v1
  2. 3 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED

Siirry hakuun Lataa diat

ScholarGateVertaile menetelmiä: Software Complexity Metrics · Defect Prediction Model. Haettu 2026-06-15 osoitteesta https://scholargate.app/fi/compare