Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Pareto-optimality and inferiority ranking× | Analytic Hierarchy Process× | ANP× | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Päätöksenteko | Päätöksenteko | Päätöksenteko |
| Menetelmäperhe | MCDM | MCDM | MCDM |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 2001 | 1980 | 1996 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Xu, X. | Saaty, T. L. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Tyyppi≠ | Outranking-utility hybrid (PROMETHEE+SAW+TOPSIS) | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) | Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure) |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Xu, X. (2001). The SIR method: A superiority and inferiority ranking method for multiple criteria decision making. European Journal of Operational Research DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 | Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8 |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | — | — | — |
| Liittyvät | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | SIR (Superiority and Inferiority Ranking) is a outranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Xu, X. in 2001. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|
|