Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Lyhyt nomologinen validiteetti× | Konvergentti validiteetti× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Psykometriikka | Psykometriikka |
| Menetelmäperhe | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1955 (concept); 2000 (short-form context) | 1959 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept); Smith et al. for short-form application | Donald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske |
| Tyyppi≠ | Validity assessment technique | Validity evidence / construct validation |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet≠ | nomological validity of abbreviated scales, short-scale construct validity, nomological network validity, abbreviated form external validity | convergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity |
| Liittyvät | 4 | 4 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | Short form nomological validity examines whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale preserves the pattern of theoretically expected correlations with conceptually related and unrelated constructs. It is a cornerstone step in justifying the use of a shortened instrument in research and applied settings. | Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|