Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Sekventiaalinen kvalitatiivispainotteinen yhdistelmäasetelma× | Laatuun painottuva monimenetelmällinen suunnittelu× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Tutkimusasetelma | Tutkimusasetelma |
| Menetelmäperhe | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 2000s–2010s | 1991–2003 (formalized in mixed methods typologies) |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Creswell & Plano Clark; Teddlie & Tashakkori | Janice Morse; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| Tyyppi | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| Alkuperäislähde | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | QUAL-priority sequential design, qualitative-dominant sequential design, qual-first sequential mixed methods, sequential exploratory qualitative-priority design | QUAL-dominant mixed methods, qualitative-dominant mixed design, qual-priority MMR, qualitative-weighted mixed methods |
| Liittyvät≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | Sequential qualitative-priority mixed design is a two-phase mixed methods approach in which a qualitative strand is conducted first and carries greater weight in the overall study. The quantitative phase follows and serves to extend, test, or generalize the qualitative findings. The QUAL-first, QUAL-dominant logic makes this design well suited to exploratory research where theory or instruments are underdeveloped and must be grounded in participants' own words before being scaled up. | Qualitative-priority mixed methods design is a mixed methods approach in which qualitative inquiry carries the greater weight — in terms of volume, analytical depth, and interpretive authority — while a supplementary quantitative strand provides supporting evidence. The design acknowledges that the phenomenon under study is best understood through meaning-making, lived experience, or social processes, with numbers used to corroborate or contextualize, not to dominate, the research story. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|