Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Robust Discrete-Event Simulation× | Robust Sensitivity Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Simulointi | Simulointi |
| Menetelmäperhe | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Syntyvuosi | 1990s–2000s | 1990s–2000s |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Banks, Carson, Nelson, Nicol (canonical DES); robust extensions: operations research community | Saltelli, A. and colleagues |
| Tyyppi≠ | Simulation with robustness analysis | Simulation-based robustness assessment pipeline |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Banks, J., Carson, J. S., Nelson, B. L., & Nicol, D. M. (2010). Discrete-Event System Simulation (5th ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN: 9780136062127 | Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Andres, T., Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., Gatelli, D., Saisana, M., & Tarantola, S. (2008). Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer. Wiley. ISBN: 9780470059975 |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | Robust DES, Uncertainty-Aware DES, Robust DEVS, Resilient Discrete-Event Simulation | RSA, Robust SA, Sensitivity Analysis under Uncertainty, Uncertainty-robust sensitivity analysis |
| Liittyvät≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | Robust Discrete-Event Simulation (Robust DES) is a simulation methodology that extends classical discrete-event simulation by explicitly incorporating uncertainty in model parameters — such as interarrival times, service durations, and resource capacities — and evaluating system performance across worst-case or distributional uncertainty sets rather than point estimates alone. It is widely applied in manufacturing, healthcare, logistics, and supply chain systems where parameter misspecification or real-world variability can lead to misleading simulation conclusions. | Robust Sensitivity Analysis (RSA) systematically evaluates how much variation in model outputs can be attributed to uncertainty or variation in model inputs, with an explicit focus on conclusions that remain valid across a wide range of plausible input conditions. It goes beyond standard sensitivity analysis by asking not only which inputs matter most, but which findings are truly robust — stable regardless of assumptions made under uncertainty. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|