Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Referenssi-ideaali-menetelmä× | ANP× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Päätöksenteko | Päätöksenteko |
| Menetelmäperhe | MCDM | MCDM |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 2016 | 1996 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Cables, E., Lamata, M. T., Verdegay, J. L. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Tyyppi≠ | Distance to user-defined reference intervals (ideal + anti-ideal) | Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure) |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Cables, E., Lamata, M. T., Verdegay, J. L. (2016). RIM-reference ideal method in multicriteria decision making. Information Sciences DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8 |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | — | — |
| Liittyvät | 8 | 8 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | RIM (Reference Ideal Method) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Cables, E., Lamata, M. T., Verdegay, J. L. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|