Vertaile menetelmiä

	Tutkimuspäiväkirja	Refleksiivinen temaattinen analyysi
Tieteenala	Kyselytutkimuksen metodologia	Laadulliset menetelmät
Menetelmäperhe	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Syntyvuosi	1981 (methodological codification); diary use in research dates to 19th-century anthropology	2006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019
Kehittäjä	Robert G. Burgess (systematic methodological treatment)	Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke
Tyyppi	Qualitative data collection and reflexivity tool	Qualitative research method
Alkuperäislähde	Burgess, R. G. (1981). Keeping a research diary. Cambridge Journal of Education, 11(1), 75–83.	Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Rinnakkaisnimet	researcher diary, field diary, research journal, reflexive diary	RTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis
Liittyvät	6	6
Tiivistelmä	A research diary is a systematic, dated log maintained by the researcher throughout a study to record methodological decisions, emergent observations, analytical hunches, and reflections on researcher positionality. Unlike a participant diary, it is authored by the researcher and functions simultaneously as a data source, an audit trail, and a reflexivity instrument.	Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed.