Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Tutkimuspäiväkirja× | Kenttämuistiinpanot× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Kyselytutkimuksen metodologia | Kyselytutkimuksen metodologia |
| Menetelmäperhe | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1981 (methodological codification); diary use in research dates to 19th-century anthropology | Late 19th century (formalized in 20th century) |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Robert G. Burgess (systematic methodological treatment) | Rooted in 19th-century anthropology and sociology; systematized by ethnographers such as Bronislaw Malinowski and later Robert Emerson et al. |
| Tyyppi≠ | Qualitative data collection and reflexivity tool | Qualitative data collection and recording technique |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Burgess, R. G. (1981). Keeping a research diary. Cambridge Journal of Education, 11(1), 75–83. link ↗ | Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226206813 |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | researcher diary, field diary, research journal, reflexive diary | fieldnotes, observational notes, ethnographic notes, jottings |
| Liittyvät | 6 | 6 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | A research diary is a systematic, dated log maintained by the researcher throughout a study to record methodological decisions, emergent observations, analytical hunches, and reflections on researcher positionality. Unlike a participant diary, it is authored by the researcher and functions simultaneously as a data source, an audit trail, and a reflexivity instrument. | Field notes are detailed written records created by researchers during or immediately after direct observation in a naturalistic setting. They capture what is seen, heard, and experienced — including behaviors, interactions, physical environments, and the researcher's own analytic impressions — forming the primary data source for ethnographic and observational studies. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|