ScholarGate
Avustaja

Vertaile menetelmiä

Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.

Regularisoitu gradienttivahvistus×Gradient Boosting×LightGBM×Regularisoitu päätöspuu×
TieteenalaKoneoppiminenKoneoppiminenKoneoppiminenKoneoppiminen
MenetelmäperheMachine learningMachine learningMachine learningMachine learning
Syntyvuosi2001 (gradient boosting); 2016 (explicit L1/L2 regularization in XGBoost)200120171984
KehittäjäChen, T. & Guestrin, C. (building on Friedman, J. H.)Friedman, J. H.Ke, G. et al. (Microsoft)Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R., & Stone, C.
TyyppiRegularized ensemble (additive tree model)Ensemble (sequential boosting of decision trees)Gradient boosting decision tree ensembleSupervised learning (regularized tree)
AlkuperäislähdeChen, T. & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785–794. DOI ↗Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy Function Approximation: A Gradient Boosting Machine. Annals of Statistics, 29(5), 1189–1232. DOI ↗Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., Ye, Q. & Liu, T.-Y. (2017). LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) 30, 3146–3154. link ↗Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R., & Stone, C. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth. ISBN: 978-0-412-04841-8
Rinnakkaisnimetpenalized gradient boosting, shrinkage-regularized boosting, XGBoost-style regularization, L1/L2 gradient boostingGradient Boosting (GBM), GBM, gradient boosted trees, gradient boosting machineLightGBM, Light Gradient Boosting Machine, lgbm, leaf-wise gradient boostingpruned decision tree, cost-complexity pruned tree, penalized decision tree, constrained CART
Liittyvät6556
TiivistelmäRegularized gradient boosting extends the classic additive tree ensemble (Friedman 2001) by embedding L1 and L2 penalty terms directly into the training objective, along with a complexity penalty on tree size. Popularized by XGBoost (Chen & Guestrin 2016), this framework reduces overfitting and improves generalization compared to unpenalized boosting, while retaining the method's characteristic accuracy on tabular data.Gradient Boosting is an ensemble learning method, formalised by Jerome H. Friedman in 2001, that combines a sequence of weak learners — typically shallow decision trees — so that each new tree is fitted to minimise the residual errors of the trees before it. It is the core algorithm behind popular implementations such as XGBoost, LightGBM and CatBoost.LightGBM is Microsoft's gradient boosting decision tree implementation, introduced by Ke and colleagues in 2017, that grows trees leaf-wise and bins features into histograms for speed. On large datasets it is much faster than XGBoost while retaining strong predictive accuracy.A regularized decision tree is a decision tree model whose complexity is intentionally limited through pruning, depth constraints, or penalty terms to prevent overfitting. Rooted in Breiman et al.'s CART framework (1984), regularization converts the greedy tree-growing procedure into a bias-variance tradeoff, yielding models that generalize better to unseen data than fully-grown trees.
ScholarGateAineisto
  1. v1
  2. 2 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED

Siirry hakuun Lataa diat

ScholarGateVertaile menetelmiä: Regularized Gradient Boosting · Gradient Boosting · LightGBM · Regularized Decision Tree. Haettu 2026-06-17 osoitteesta https://scholargate.app/fi/compare