Vertaile menetelmiä

	Root Assessment Method	Analytic Hierarchy Process	CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC)
Tieteenala	Päätöksenteko	Päätöksenteko	Päätöksenteko
Menetelmäperhe	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
Syntyvuosi	2023	1980	1995
Kehittäjä	Sotoudeh-Anvari, A.	Saaty, T. L.	Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
Tyyppi	Power-function aggregation with benefit/cost separation	Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)	Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Alkuperäislähde	Sotoudeh-Anvari, A. (2023). Root Assessment Method (RAM): A novel multi-criteria decision making method and its applications in sustainability challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production	Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713	Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research
Rinnakkaisnimet	—	—	—
Liittyvät	6	8	8
Tiivistelmä	RAM (Root Assessment Method) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Sotoudeh-Anvari, A. in 2023. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.