Vertaile menetelmiä

	Kvantitatiivisesti dominoiva yhdistettyjen menetelmien metajohtopäätös	Kvantitatiivispainotteinen monimenetelmällinen asetelma
Tieteenala	Tutkimusasetelma	Tutkimusasetelma
Menetelmäperhe	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Syntyvuosi	2003–2007	2003–2009
Kehittäjä	Tashakkori & Teddlie (meta-inference concept); Creswell & Plano Clark (dominance weighting framework)	Creswell & Plano Clark; Teddlie & Tashakkori
Tyyppi	Mixed methods integration procedure	Mixed methods research design
Alkuperäislähde	Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761920731	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379
Rinnakkaisnimet	QUAN-dominant meta-inference, quantitatively weighted meta-inference, QUAN-priority integration inference, quantitative-weighted mixed inference	QUAN-dominant mixed methods, quantitative-dominant mixed methods, quan-priority design, quantitative-first mixed methods
Liittyvät	6	6
Tiivistelmä	Quantitative-dominant mixed methods meta-inference is an integration procedure in which the researcher draws an overarching conclusion by combining inferences from both quantitative and qualitative strands, while explicitly assigning greater evidential weight to the quantitative results. The qualitative strand serves a supporting, elaborating, or contextualizing role rather than an equal voice in the final interpretation.	Quantitative-priority mixed methods design is a research approach in which quantitative data and analysis carry the primary explanatory weight, while qualitative data play a supplementary or corroborating role. The researcher collects and analyzes quantitative data first (or concurrently with greater emphasis), then uses qualitative findings to elaborate, explain, or contextualize the statistical results. Priority and sequence together define where integration occurs and how each strand informs the other.