Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| PROMETHEE VI× | PROMETHEE I× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Päätöksenteko | Päätöksenteko |
| Menetelmäperhe | MCDM | MCDM |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1995 | 1986 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Brans, J. P. Mareschal, B. | Brans, J. P., Vincke, P., Mareschal, B. |
| Tyyppi≠ | Sensitivity analysis of PROMETHEE rankings across all feasible weight combinations | Outranking via positive/negative flows (partial preorder) |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Brans, J. P., Mareschal, B. (1995). The PROMETHEE VI procedure: how to differentiate hard from soft multicriteria problems. Journal of Decision Systems DOI ↗ | Brans, J. P., Vincke, P., Mareschal, B. (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research DOI ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | — | — |
| Liittyvät≠ | 2 | 8 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | PROMETHEE-VI (PROMETHEE VI — Walking Weights Sensitivity) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Brans, J. P. Mareschal, B. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | PROMETHEE-I (PROMETHEE I — Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment Evaluations I (partial ranking)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Brans, J. P., Vincke, P., Mareschal, B. in 1986. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|