Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Pragmatic Mixed Methods Design× | Samanaikainen sisällytetty monimenetelmällinen asetelma× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Tutkimusasetelma | Tutkimusasetelma |
| Menetelmäperhe | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | Early 2000s (formalised); pragmatism as philosophy late 19th–early 20th century | 2003–2007 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (formalised); philosophical grounding in William James, John Dewey, Richard Rorty | John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| Tyyppi | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1412975179 |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | pragmatic MMR, pragmatism-guided mixed methods, pragmatic inquiry design, practical mixed methods | embedded mixed methods, nested mixed methods design, concurrent nested design, CEMM |
| Liittyvät | 6 | 6 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | Pragmatic mixed methods design is a research approach that selects and combines quantitative and qualitative methods based on what best answers the research question, rather than adhering to a single philosophical paradigm. Rooted in the philosophical tradition of pragmatism — associated with William James, John Dewey, and later Richard Rorty — it treats methodological fit and practical utility as the primary criteria for design decisions. The approach is endorsed by leading mixed methods scholars including Creswell and Plano Clark as the most common philosophical worldview underpinning mixed methods work. | The concurrent embedded mixed methods design collects quantitative and qualitative data at the same time, but assigns unequal priority to the two strands: one (usually quantitative) serves as the primary study, while the other (usually qualitative) is nested inside it to answer a supplementary question. The embedded strand does not stand alone; it provides a different perspective on the same phenomenon within a single unified study. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|