Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Poverty Dynamics Analysis× | Livelihood Vulnerability Assessment× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Development Studies | Development Studies |
| Menetelmäperhe | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1998 | 2009 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Jyotsna Jalan & Martin Ravallion; Bob Baulch & John Hoddinott | IPCC framing; W. Neil Adger; Micah Hahn, Anne Riederer & Stanley Foster (LVI) |
| Tyyppi≠ | Panel-data analysis of poverty over time | Composite-indicator framework for assessing climate and livelihood vulnerability |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Jalan, J., & Ravallion, M. (1998). Transient Poverty in Postreform Rural China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 26(2), 338–357. DOI ↗ | Hahn, M. B., Riederer, A. M., & Foster, S. O. (2009). The Livelihood Vulnerability Index: A pragmatic approach to assessing risks from climate variability and change — A case study in Mozambique. Global Environmental Change, 19(1), 74–88. DOI ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet≠ | Poverty Transitions Analysis, Chronic and Transient Poverty Analysis, Poverty Spells Analysis, Poverty Mobility Analysis | Livelihood Vulnerability Index, LVI, Climate Vulnerability Assessment, Social Vulnerability Assessment |
| Liittyvät | 4 | 4 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | Poverty Dynamics Analysis uses household panel data to study how poverty changes over time for the same people, distinguishing those who are persistently poor from those who move in and out of poverty. Building on the work of Jyotsna Jalan and Martin Ravallion (1998) and the comparative synthesis of Bob Baulch and John Hoddinott (2000), it reframes poverty from a static headcount into a study of entries, exits, and spells. Its central output is a separation of total poverty into a chronic component, attributable to persistently low living standards, and a transient component, attributable to fluctuations around the poverty line over time. | Livelihood Vulnerability Assessment is a framework for measuring how exposed and susceptible households and communities are to climatic and socio-economic stresses, and how able they are to cope and adapt. Drawing on the IPCC's conceptualisation of vulnerability as a function of exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity and operationalised in composite tools such as Hahn and colleagues' Livelihood Vulnerability Index, it translates the social and environmental dimensions of risk into indicators that can be compared across places and groups to guide adaptation and poverty-reduction investment. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|