Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Post-Materialism Index× | Poliittisen ideologian asteikko× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Poliittinen psykologia | Poliittinen psykologia |
| Menetelmäperhe | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1971 | 1990 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Ronald Inglehart | Hans-Dieter Klingemann & Norberto Bobbio |
| Tyyppi≠ | Ranked-priorities value index | Self-report |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Inglehart, R. (1971). The silent revolution in Europe: Intergenerational change in post-industrial societies. American Political Science Review, 65(4), 991-1017. DOI ↗ | Fuchs, D., & Klingemann, H. D. (1990). The left-right schema. In M. Kent Jennings & Jan W. Van Deth (Eds.), Continuities in political action. Berlin: De Gruyter. link ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | Inglehart Index, Materialist-Postmaterialist Index, Four-Item Values Index | Left-Right Scale, Ideology Continuum, Political Spectrum Scale |
| Liittyvät≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | The Post-Materialism Index, developed by Ronald Inglehart (1971), classifies individuals as materialist, postmaterialist, or mixed based on the priority they assign to physical and economic security versus self-expression, belonging, and quality of life. It operationalizes Inglehart's silent-revolution thesis that prosperity and security in postwar democracies caused an intergenerational shift from materialist to postmaterialist value priorities. | The Political Ideology Scale measures individual self-placement on a left-right political spectrum, capturing fundamental preferences for government role, economic organization, and social values. The single-item self-placement measure (most common) asks respondents to rate themselves on a 0-10 or 0-100 continuum; multi-item versions assess distinct ideological dimensions (economic policy, social policy, nationalism). The left-right axis remains the dominant organizing principle of political competition globally, predicting party choice, policy preferences, and electoral behavior despite critiques that it oversimplifies multidimensional political space. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|