Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Polytomisen asteikon kehittäminen× | Generalisoitavuusteoria (G-teoria)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Psykometriikka | Psykometriikka |
| Menetelmäperhe | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1969–1982 | 1963–1972 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Samejima, F.; Masters, G. N. (independently) | Lee J. Cronbach, Goldine Gleser, Harinder Nanda, Nageswari Rajaratnam |
| Tyyppi≠ | Psychometric scale construction | Variance-components reliability model |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Embretson, S. E. & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 978-0805828191 | Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H. & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles. Wiley. link ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet≠ | polytomous item development, ordered-category scale construction, rating scale development, multi-category item development | G-theory, G-study / D-study framework, variance components reliability |
| Liittyvät≠ | 6 | 4 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | Polytomous scale development is the systematic construction and validation of measurement instruments whose items have three or more ordered response categories — such as Likert-type, rating, or partial-credit items. It applies polytomous item response theory models or ordinal factor analysis methods to evaluate item quality, estimate latent trait levels, and build a psychometrically sound scale. | Generalizability Theory is a psychometric framework that decomposes observed score variance into multiple sources — persons, items, raters, occasions, and their interactions — using analysis of variance. It replaces the single reliability coefficient of classical test theory with a family of coefficients that tell researchers how well scores generalize across different measurement conditions. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|