Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| PIvot -parivertailu Kriteerien Suhteellisen Merkityksen Arviointi× | Additiivinen suhdearviointi× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Päätöksenteko | Päätöksenteko |
| Menetelmäperhe | MCDM | MCDM |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 2017 | 2010 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Stanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Maksimović, M. | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. |
| Tyyppi≠ | Pivot pairwise sequential ratio weighting | Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row) |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Stanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Maksimović, M. (2017). An approach to determining customer satisfaction in mobile commerce: A new approach to the SWARA method — PIPRECIA. Transformations in Business & Economics link ↗ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | — | — |
| Liittyvät | 8 | 8 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | PIPRECIA (PIvot Pairwise RElative Criteria Importance Assessment) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Stanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Maksimović, M. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|