Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Osallistava hermeneuttinen fenomenologia× | Osallistava etnografia× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Laadulliset menetelmät | Laadulliset menetelmät |
| Menetelmäperhe | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1990s–2000s (collaborative turn); classical roots early 20th century |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Martin Heidegger (hermeneutic base); Max van Manen (pedagogical application); Peter Reason & colleagues (participatory integration) | Rooted in classical ethnography (Malinowski, Boas); collaborative turn formalised by Luke Eric Lassiter and others in the 1990s–2000s |
| Tyyppi | Qualitative research design | Qualitative research design |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | van Manen, M. (1990). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. State University of New York Press. ISBN: 978-0791404645 | Lassiter, L. E. (2005). The Chicago Guide to Collaborative Ethnography. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226469058 |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | collaborative hermeneutic phenomenology, participatory interpretive phenomenology, co-constructive hermeneutic inquiry, PHP | collaborative ethnography, participatory fieldwork, engaged ethnography, community-based ethnography |
| Liittyvät | 5 | 5 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | Participatory Hermeneutic Phenomenology combines the interpretive, text-oriented tradition of hermeneutic phenomenology — rooted in Heidegger and developed by van Manen — with a participatory ethos in which research participants are treated as active co-inquirers rather than passive informants. The approach seeks to understand the meaning of lived experience through a collaborative hermeneutic circle where researcher and participants jointly interpret experience, text, and context across iterative cycles of dialogue. | Participatory ethnography is a qualitative research design in which community members are not merely subjects of study but active collaborators throughout the research process — from problem formulation and data collection to analysis and writing. Building on classical ethnographic fieldwork, it shifts the researcher–participant relationship toward genuine partnership, producing knowledge that is accountable to the communities from which it emerges. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|