Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Participatory GIS× | Stakeholder Analysis for Development× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Development Studies | Development Studies |
| Menetelmäperhe | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 2006 | 1997 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Robert Chambers; Jon Corbett; PGIS practitioner community | Robin Grimble & Kate Wellard; Mark Reed and colleagues |
| Tyyppi≠ | Participatory spatial data and mapping approach | Analytical method for identifying and characterising actors |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Chambers, R. (2006). Participatory Mapping and Geographic Information Systems: Whose Map? Who is Empowered and Who Disempowered? Who Gains and Who Loses? The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 25(1), 1-11. DOI ↗ | Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., Quinn, C. H., & Stringer, L. C. (2009). Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933-1949. DOI ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | PGIS, PPGIS, Participatory mapping with GIS, Community mapping | Stakeholder mapping, Power-interest analysis, Actor analysis, Influence-importance matrix |
| Liittyvät | 4 | 4 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | Participatory Geographic Information Systems (PGIS), and the related Public Participation GIS (PPGIS), are approaches in which communities themselves create and use spatial data and maps to represent local spatial knowledge for resource management, land and resource tenure, and planning. Spanning a continuum from sketch mapping with sticks and stones on the ground to georeferenced data held in formal GIS, the approach merges the empowering ethos of participatory development, articulated by Robert Chambers, with the analytical and communicative power of geographic information technology. | Stakeholder analysis in development is a structured method for identifying the actors with a stake in an intervention and characterising their interests, power, and influence, so that programmes can be designed and implemented with a clear view of whom they affect and who can affect them. Drawing on the natural-resource-management tradition of Robin Grimble and Kate Wellard and the methodological typology of Mark Reed and colleagues, it employs tools such as the power-interest grid, the influence-importance matrix, and Venn diagrams to make the social landscape of a project explicit. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|