Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Plithogeeninen laajennus P-CODAS-menetelmästä× | CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Päätöksenteko | Päätöksenteko |
| Menetelmäperhe | MCDM | MCDM |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 2018 | 1995 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Smarandache, F. | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. |
| Tyyppi≠ | Plithogenic outranking/ranking — Plithogenic Set (PltS: attribute values with contradiction degrees) | Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Smarandache, F. (2018). Plithogeny, Plithogenic Set, Logic, Probability, and Statistics. Pons Publishing, Brussels link ↗ | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | — | — |
| Liittyvät | 8 | 8 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | P-CODAS (Plithogenic extension of P-CODAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Smarandache, F. in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|