ScholarGate
Avustaja

Vertaile menetelmiä

Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.

Organisation, Rangement Et Synthèse de données rElaTionnEllEs×Kriteeri-vaikutuksen mittausjärjestelmä×
TieteenalaPäätöksentekoPäätöksenteko
MenetelmäperheMCDMMCDM
Syntyvuosi19822025
KehittäjäRoubens, M.Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N.
TyyppiOutranking (weak order aggregation via Besson rank)Impact-based weighted scoring (criterion-level deviation analysis)
AlkuperäislähdeRoubens, M. (1982). Preference relations on actions and criteria in multicriteria decision making. European Journal of Operational Research DOI ↗Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. (2025). A New Criteria Importance Assessment (CIMAS) Method in Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making: Criteria Evaluation for Supplier Selection. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS — Series: Mechanical Engineering DOI ↗
Rinnakkaisnimet
Liittyvät88
TiivistelmäORESTE (Organisation, Rangement Et Synthèse de données rElaTionnEllEs) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Roubens, M. in 1982. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CIMAS (Criterion Impact MeAsurement System) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. in 2025. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateAineisto
  1. v1
  2. 1 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED

Siirry hakuun Lataa diat

ScholarGateVertaile menetelmiä: ORESTE · CIMAS. Haettu 2026-06-17 osoitteesta https://scholargate.app/fi/compare