Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Ordinaalinen Rasch-malli (Rating Scale- ja Partial Credit -mallit)× | Differentiaalinen kohdefunktionaalisuus (DIF)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Psykometriikka | Psykometriikka |
| Menetelmäperhe | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1978–1982 | 1970s–1993 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | David Andrich (RSM, 1978); Geoff Masters (PCM, 1982) | William H. Angoff and colleagues (ETS); systematized by Holland & Wainer |
| Tyyppi≠ | Item response model for ordered categories | Item-level bias detection |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43(4), 561–573. DOI ↗ | Holland, P. W. & Wainer, H. (Eds.) (1993). Differential Item Functioning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 978-0805809589 |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | Rating Scale Model, Partial Credit Model, RSM, PCM | DIF, item bias analysis, measurement non-equivalence, item-level measurement bias |
| Liittyvät≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | The ordinal Rasch model extends the dichotomous Rasch framework to items with ordered response categories such as Likert-type scales. It places both persons and items on a shared interval-level metric, enabling principled measurement from ordinal data while checking whether items function consistently across all response thresholds. | Differential item functioning identifies test or survey items that behave differently for examinees from different groups — such as gender, ethnicity, or language background — after controlling for the underlying ability or trait being measured. DIF analysis is essential for fairness evaluation in educational testing and psychological scale development. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|