ScholarGate
Avustaja

Vertaile menetelmiä

Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.

Uusi menetelmä objektiivisten kriteeripainojen määrittämiseen×Combinative Distance-Based Assessment×
TieteenalaPäätöksentekoPäätöksenteko
MenetelmäperheMCDMMCDM
Syntyvuosi20172016
KehittäjäBulut, E.Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J.
TyyppiWeight_Objective (normalised matrix column-mean based)Distance from anti-ideal (Euclidean + Taxicab)
AlkuperäislähdeBulut, E. (2017). A comparative analysis of the criteria weights determination methods for selection of ship propulsion system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment link ↗Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J. (2016). A new combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method for multi-criteria decision-making. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research link ↗
Rinnakkaisnimet
Liittyvät88
TiivistelmäNMD (New Method of Determining objective criterion weights) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bulut, E. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CODAS (Combinative Distance-Based Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateAineisto
  1. v1
  2. 1 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED

Siirry hakuun Lataa diat

ScholarGateVertaile menetelmiä: NMD · CODAS. Haettu 2026-06-15 osoitteesta https://scholargate.app/fi/compare