Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Uusi menetelmä objektiivisten kriteeripainojen määrittämiseen× | Yhdistetty kompromissiratkaisu× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Päätöksenteko | Päätöksenteko |
| Menetelmäperhe | MCDM | MCDM |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 2017 | 2019 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Bulut, E. | Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. |
| Tyyppi≠ | Weight_Objective (normalised matrix column-mean based) | Aggregated exponential comparison (WSM + WPM combination) |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Bulut, E. (2017). A comparative analysis of the criteria weights determination methods for selection of ship propulsion system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment link ↗ | Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2019). A combined compromise solution (COCOSO) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems. Management Decision DOI ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | — | — |
| Liittyvät | 8 | 8 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | NMD (New Method of Determining objective criterion weights) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bulut, E. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | COCOSO (Combined Compromise Solution) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|