Vertaile menetelmiä

	Verkostoihin perustuva tieteellinen analyysi	Tieteen kartoitus
Tieteenala	Scientometriikka	Bibliometriikka
Menetelmäperhe	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Syntyvuosi	1965 (Price); computational refinement 2000s–2010s	2000s
Kehittäjä	Derek J. de Solla Price (network citation structure); Nees Jan van Eck & Ludo Waltman (computational network mapping)	Katy Börner, Chaomei Chen, and others
Tyyppi	Quantitative bibliometric method	Method
Alkuperäislähde	van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.	Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179–255.
Rinnakkaisnimet	scientometric network analysis, bibliometric network analysis, citation network scientometrics, science network mapping	knowledge mapping, domain mapping, research landscape visualization
Liittyvät	6	5
Tiivistelmä	Network-based scientometric analysis applies graph-theoretic methods to bibliographic data — publications, citations, authors, and keywords — to map the intellectual structure of a scientific field. By modeling documents or authors as nodes and their relationships (citations, co-authorships, co-word occurrences) as edges, it reveals clusters of knowledge, central actors, emerging topics, and the flow of ideas across disciplines. Tools such as VOSviewer, Gephi, and the R package bibliometrix are commonly used.	Science mapping is a bibliometric visualization method that creates visual representations of research domains, showing the structure, development, and relationships of scientific fields. Using bibliographic data (citations, keywords, authors, journals), science mapping algorithms generate network diagrams where nodes represent documents, concepts, or authors and edges represent relationships (citation, collaboration, semantic similarity). The resulting maps make invisible intellectual structures visible, enabling researchers to understand field topology, identify emerging areas, and navigate disciplinary landscapes. Pioneered by Börner, Chen, and Boyack in the 2000s, science mapping has become a standard tool in research evaluation and strategic planning.