ScholarGate
Avustaja

Vertaile menetelmiä

Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.

AROMAN-menetelmän neutrosofian laajennus×CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC)×
TieteenalaPäätöksentekoPäätöksenteko
MenetelmäperheMCDMMCDM
Syntyvuosi20231995
KehittäjäBošković et al.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TyyppiNeutrosophic outranking/ranking — Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3)Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
AlkuperäislähdeBošković et al. (2023). Neutrosophic Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for two-step Normalization. IEEE Access link ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Rinnakkaisnimet
Liittyvät88
TiivistelmäN-AROMAN (Neutrosophic extension of AROMAN) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bošković et al. in 2023. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateAineisto
  1. v1
  2. 1 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED

Siirry hakuun Lataa diat

ScholarGateVertaile menetelmiä: N-AROMAN · CRITIC. Haettu 2026-06-18 osoitteesta https://scholargate.app/fi/compare