Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Monitapausututkimus – Monitapausperustainen tapaustutkimusasetelma× | Yksittäistapaus-tutkimus× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Laadulliset menetelmät | Laadulliset menetelmät |
| Menetelmäperhe | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1984 (Yin); 2006 (Stake's collective case study formalization) | 1984 (Yin's seminal protocol); 1995 (Stake's art-of-case-study framework) |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake (parallel traditions) | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake |
| Tyyppi≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative research method |
| Alkuperäislähde | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | multiple-case design, collective case study, multi-site case study, multi-case study | single-site case study, holistic single-case design, intrinsic case study, bounded case inquiry |
| Liittyvät≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | A multiple case study (also called a multiple-case design or collective case study) is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are examined together to pursue a common research question. By studying several instances of a phenomenon in parallel, the researcher can compare patterns, identify convergences and divergences, and build more robust, transferable conclusions than a single case could support. The design draws principally from Robert Yin's case-study methodology and Robert Stake's collective case study tradition. | A single-case study is a qualitative research design that investigates one bounded instance — an organization, program, event, individual, or community — in its real-world context through multiple converging sources of evidence. Developed into a rigorous social-science method chiefly by Robert Yin and Robert Stake, it is especially powerful when the case is unique, extreme, critical, or revelatory, and when the research question begins with 'how' or 'why' rather than 'how many.' |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|