Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Multi-source In-depth Interview× | Pitkittäishaastattelu× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Kyselytutkimuksen metodologia | Kyselytutkimuksen metodologia |
| Menetelmäperhe | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1980s–1990s (formalized in qualitative inquiry literature) | 1990s–2000s (as a formalised qualitative method) |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Grounded in qualitative traditions consolidated by Patton, Lincoln & Guba, and others | Rooted in qualitative longitudinal research traditions; systematised by Johnny Saldana |
| Tyyppi≠ | Qualitative data collection technique | Qualitative longitudinal data collection technique |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711 | Saldana, J. (2003). Longitudinal Qualitative Research: Analyzing Change Through Time. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759103917 |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | multi-informant in-depth interview, multi-perspective qualitative interview, multiple-source IDI, multi-stakeholder in-depth interview | repeated in-depth interview, longitudinal qualitative interview, panel qualitative interview, longitudinal IDI |
| Liittyvät | 5 | 5 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | The multi-source in-depth interview is a qualitative data collection strategy in which extended, open-ended interviews are conducted with participants drawn from two or more distinct source groups — such as providers and clients, managers and staff, or experts and laypeople. Collecting data across diverse informant positions enriches description and enables the researcher to examine a phenomenon from multiple vantage points within a single study. | Longitudinal in-depth interviewing is a qualitative data collection technique in which the same participants are interviewed in depth on multiple occasions across a defined time span. By revisiting the same people over weeks, months, or years, researchers can trace how experiences, identities, attitudes, and meanings change — something a single interview cannot reveal. It is widely used in life-course research, health studies, education, and social policy. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|