ScholarGate
Avustaja

Vertaile menetelmiä

Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.

Mittausinvarianssin testaus×Differentiaalisen kohdeanalyysin (DIF) analyysi×Rakenteellinen yhtälömallinnus (SEM)×
TieteenalaPsykometriikkaPsykometriikkaTilastotiede
MenetelmäperheLatent structureLatent structureLatent structure
Syntyvuosi200019881970
KehittäjäVandenberg & LancePaul W. Holland & Dorothy T. Thayer (Mantel-Haenszel approach, 1988)Karl Jöreskog (LISREL framework, 1970s)
TyyppiMulti-group confirmatory factor analysis procedureItem-level fairness / measurement equivalence analysisLatent variable / causal modeling
AlkuperäislähdeVandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗Holland, P. W. & Thayer, D. T. (1988). Differential Item Performance and the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure. ETS Research Report Series. link ↗Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. ISBN: 978-1473756540
RinnakkaisnimetFactorial Invariance, Measurement Equivalence, Configural-Metric-Scalar Testing, Ölçüm DeğişmezliğiMadde Yanlılık Analizi (DIF — Differential Item Functioning), item bias analysis, Mantel-Haenszel DIF, Lord chi-square DIFYapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi (SEM), structural equation modelling, covariance structure analysis, latent variable modeling
Liittyvät345
TiivistelmäMeasurement invariance testing is a sequence of nested confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models that examines whether a psychological scale measures the same latent construct in the same way across distinct groups or time points. Systematized and popularized by Vandenberg and Lance (2000), the procedure tests a hierarchy of constraints — from identical factor patterns to identical item intercepts — so that researchers can justify meaningful group comparisons on latent means.Differential Item Functioning analysis examines whether examinees from different groups — such as gender, ethnicity, or language background — who have the same underlying ability respond differently to a test item. First formalised by Holland and Thayer in 1988 via the Mantel-Haenszel procedure, it is the principal tool in modern test development for detecting and removing item bias.Structural equation modeling is a multivariate statistical framework that simultaneously estimates a measurement model — relating observed indicators to latent constructs — and a structural model specifying directional or reciprocal relationships among those constructs. Rooted in the LISREL tradition developed by Karl Jöreskog in the 1970s, SEM is the standard tool for testing complex theoretical models in the social, behavioural, and management sciences.
ScholarGateAineisto
  1. v1
  2. 1 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED

Siirry hakuun Lataa diat

ScholarGateVertaile menetelmiä: Measurement Invariance · DIF Analysis · SEM. Haettu 2026-06-19 osoitteesta https://scholargate.app/fi/compare