ScholarGate
Avustaja

Vertaile menetelmiä

Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.

Paritettu satunnaistettu kontrolloitu koe×Pragmaattinen satunnaistettu kontrolloitu tutkimus×
TieteenalaEpidemiologiaEpidemiologia
MenetelmäperheProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
SyntyvuosiMid-20th century concept; methodological formalization circa 2000–20101967
KehittäjäDeveloped formally in biostatistics literature; Greevy, Imai and colleagues advanced modern frameworks in the 2000sDaniel Schwartz & Joseph Lellouch
TyyppiExperimental clinical study designInterventional study design
AlkuperäislähdeImai, K., King, G., & Nall, C. (2009). The essential role of pair matching in cluster-randomized experiments, with application to the Mexican universal health insurance evaluation. Statistical Science, 24(1), 29–53. DOI ↗Schwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI ↗
Rinnakkaisnimetmatched RCT, matched-pair randomized trial, matched randomized controlled trial, covariate-matched RCTpragmatic RCT, effectiveness trial, real-world RCT, practical clinical trial
Liittyvät66
TiivistelmäA matched randomized clinical trial pairs participants (or clusters) on key baseline characteristics before randomization, then allocates one member of each pair to treatment and the other to control. This design combines the causal validity of randomization with the covariate balance of matching, increasing statistical efficiency and reducing confounding from known prognostic variables without sacrificing the internal validity of a controlled experiment.A pragmatic randomized clinical trial (pragmatic RCT) is an interventional study that tests whether a treatment works under routine clinical conditions, as opposed to the tightly controlled setting of an explanatory trial. It prioritizes broad eligibility, flexible delivery, and patient-relevant outcomes to answer the question 'Does this treatment work in everyday practice?' rather than 'Can this treatment work under ideal circumstances?' The distinction between pragmatic and explanatory trials was formally articulated by Schwartz and Lellouch in 1967 and operationalized by the PRECIS tool in 2009.
ScholarGateAineisto
  1. v1
  2. 2 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED

Siirry hakuun Lataa diat

ScholarGateVertaile menetelmiä: Matched Randomized Clinical Trial · Pragmatic randomized clinical trial. Haettu 2026-06-19 osoitteesta https://scholargate.app/fi/compare