Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Pitkittäinen erottelupätevyys× | Konvergentti validiteetti× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Psykometriikka | Psykometriikka |
| Menetelmäperhe | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1993–2000 | 1959 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Formalized through SEM-based validity traditions (Campbell & Fiske, 1959; Cole & Maxwell, 1993) | Donald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske |
| Tyyppi≠ | Validity assessment / measurement quality | Validity evidence / construct validation |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Cole, D. A. & Maxwell, S. E. (1993). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558–577. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet≠ | LDV, longitudinal construct distinctiveness, cross-time discriminant validity, temporal discriminant validity | convergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity |
| Liittyvät | 4 | 4 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | Longitudinal discriminant validity tests whether a psychological construct measured at two or more time points is empirically distinct across occasions — ensuring that the same construct does not collapse into a single undifferentiated mass over time. It is a prerequisite for meaningful change modeling in panel and longitudinal research. | Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|