Vertaile menetelmiä

	Longitudinaalinen konvergentti validiteetti	Pitkittäinen konfirmatorinen faktorimalli
Tieteenala	Psykometriikka	Psykometriikka
Menetelmäperhe	Latent structure	Latent structure
Syntyvuosi	1997–2003	1970s–1990s
Kehittäjä	Cole & Maxwell; Widaman & Reise	Karl Jöreskog (CFA framework); longitudinal extension by Wheaton, Muthén, and Alwin in the 1970s–1990s
Tyyppi	Validity evidence framework	Longitudinal latent variable / measurement model
Alkuperäislähde	Cole, D. A. & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558–577.	Widaman, K. F. & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In K. J. Bryant, M. Windle & S. G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281–324). American Psychological Association.
Rinnakkaisnimet	longitudinal construct validity, repeated-measure convergent validity, cross-time convergent validity, temporal convergent validity	longitudinal CFA, repeated-measures CFA, longitudinal measurement model, panel CFA
Liittyvät	6	6
Tiivistelmä	Longitudinal convergent validity evaluates whether a scale's indicators correlate with theoretically related constructs not just at a single time point but consistently across repeated measurement occasions. It extends standard convergent validity testing into longitudinal designs to ensure that the scale measures the intended construct in the same meaningful way over time.	Longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis (longitudinal CFA) applies a theoretically specified measurement model to data collected at two or more time points. Its primary purpose is to verify that a scale measures the same latent construct in the same way over time — a prerequisite for drawing valid conclusions about change from repeated-measures data.