ScholarGate
Avustaja

Vertaile menetelmiä

Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.

Pitkittäinen autoetnografia×Refleksiivinen temaattinen analyysi×
TieteenalaLaadulliset menetelmätLaadulliset menetelmät
MenetelmäperheProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Syntyvuosi2000s–2010s2006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019
KehittäjäCarolyn Ellis, Arthur Bochner (autoethnography foundations); longitudinal extension by various scholars from 2000s onwardVirginia Braun & Victoria Clarke
TyyppiQualitative longitudinal research designQualitative research method
AlkuperäislähdeEllis, C. (2004). The Ethnographic I: A Methodological Novel about Autoethnography. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759103535Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
Rinnakkaisnimetlongitudinal self-ethnography, temporal autoethnography, long-term autoethnography, longitudinal personal narrative researchRTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis
Liittyvät66
TiivistelmäLongitudinal autoethnography is a qualitative research design in which the researcher systematically documents, reflects on, and analyzes their own lived experience across an extended period — typically months to years. By combining the self-reflexive focus of autoethnography with a longitudinal temporal structure, this approach reveals how personal meanings, identities, and social understandings evolve over time. It bridges the personal and the cultural, producing richly layered narratives that connect individual transformation to broader social processes.Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed.
ScholarGateAineisto
  1. v1
  2. 2 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED

Siirry hakuun Lataa diat

ScholarGateVertaile menetelmiä: Longitudinal Autoethnography · Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Haettu 2026-06-18 osoitteesta https://scholargate.app/fi/compare