Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Lineaarinen maksiminormitus× | Additiivinen suhdearviointi× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Päätöksenteko | Päätöksenteko |
| Menetelmäperhe | MCDM | MCDM |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1967 | 2010 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Fishburn, P. C. | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. |
| Tyyppi≠ | Normalization (linear-max, ratio-based) | Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row) |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Fishburn, P. C. (1967). Additive Utilities with Incomplete Product Sets: Application to Priorities and Assignments. Operations Research DOI ↗ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | — | — |
| Liittyvät≠ | 4 | 8 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | LINEAR-MAX-NORMALIZATION (Linear Max Normalization — division by column maximum (benefit) or column minimum over value (cost)) is a normalization multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Fishburn, P. C. in 1967. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|