Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| WASPAS-menetelmän intervallilaajennus× | CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Päätöksenteko | Päätöksenteko |
| Menetelmäperhe | MCDM | MCDM |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1966 | 1995 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Moore, R. E. | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. |
| Tyyppi≠ | Interval outranking/ranking — Interval Number (IN: [a, b]) | Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Moore, R. E. (1966). Interval Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs link ↗ | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | — | — |
| Liittyvät | 8 | 8 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | IV-WASPAS (Interval extension of WASPAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Moore, R. E. in 1966. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|