Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Tulkinnallinen yksittäistapaus-tutkimus× | Tulkinnallinen monen tapaustutkimuksen asetelma× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Laadulliset menetelmät | Laadulliset menetelmät |
| Menetelmäperhe | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1978–1995 (Stake 1978, 1995; Yin 1984) | 1980s–1990s (Yin 1984; Stake 1995, 2006) |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Robert E. Stake (intrinsic/interpretive framing); Robert K. Yin (design typology) | Robert K. Yin (multiple case study design); Robert E. Stake (collective/interpretive case study) |
| Tyyppi | Qualitative research design | Qualitative research design |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803957671 | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | single-site case study, intrinsic case study, interpretive case research, bounded single-case inquiry | multi-site interpretive case study, collective case study, interpretive multi-case design, constructivist multiple case study |
| Liittyvät | 5 | 5 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | An interpretive single case study is a qualitative research design that examines one bounded instance — a person, organisation, event, programme, or community — in depth, with the explicit goal of understanding what that case means to the people within it. Drawing on Stake's notion of the intrinsic case and an interpretivist epistemological stance, the approach treats meaning as socially constructed and context-dependent, making rich, contextual understanding its primary output. | Interpretive multiple case study is a qualitative research design in which the researcher studies two or more bounded cases in depth, using an interpretivist stance to understand how participants construct meaning within each setting. Rather than seeking law-like generalizations, it aims to generate rich, context-sensitive understanding that is then compared across cases to reveal patterns, contrasts, and theoretical insights. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|