Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Tulkinnallinen monen tapaustutkimuksen asetelma× | Tulkinnallinen "grounded theory" (interpretive grounded theory)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Laadulliset menetelmät | Laadulliset menetelmät |
| Menetelmäperhe | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1980s–1990s (Yin 1984; Stake 1995, 2006) | 1967 (foundational); interpretivist articulation ~2000–2006 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Robert K. Yin (multiple case study design); Robert E. Stake (collective/interpretive case study) | Kathy Charmaz (interpretivist/constructivist strand); foundational grounded theory by Glaser & Strauss |
| Tyyppi≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative research methodology |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539 |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | multi-site interpretive case study, collective case study, interpretive multi-case design, constructivist multiple case study | interpretivist grounded theory, constructivist grounded theory, IGT, grounded theory — interpretivist strand |
| Liittyvät≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | Interpretive multiple case study is a qualitative research design in which the researcher studies two or more bounded cases in depth, using an interpretivist stance to understand how participants construct meaning within each setting. Rather than seeking law-like generalizations, it aims to generate rich, context-sensitive understanding that is then compared across cases to reveal patterns, contrasts, and theoretical insights. | Interpretive grounded theory is a qualitative methodology that builds substantive theory inductively from data while working from an interpretivist epistemological stance. Developed most fully by Kathy Charmaz, it holds that researcher and participant co-construct meaning, that categories are created rather than discovered, and that the resulting theory is one plausible account among others rather than an objective rendering of social reality. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|