Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Tulkinnallinen metafora-analyysi× | Temaattinen analyysi× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala≠ | Laadulliset menetelmät | Laadullinen tutkimus |
| Menetelmäperhe | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1980 (conceptual foundations); 2000s (systematic qualitative procedure) | 2006 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Rudolf Schmitt (systematic procedure); grounded in Lakoff & Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory | Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke |
| Tyyppi≠ | Qualitative interpretive analysis | Method |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226468013 | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet≠ | IMA, hermeneutic metaphor analysis, qualitative metaphor analysis, interpretive conceptual metaphor analysis | TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis |
| Liittyvät≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | Interpretive metaphor analysis is a qualitative method that systematically identifies and interprets the conceptual metaphors embedded in participants' language to understand how they make meaning of their experiences. Rooted in Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory and adapted for empirical social research by Rudolf Schmitt, it applies a hermeneutic lens to treat metaphors not as stylistic ornaments but as windows into underlying cognitive and cultural frames. | Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|