ScholarGate
Avustaja

Vertaile menetelmiä

Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.

Impact Evaluation Design×Kontrafaktuaalinen vaikuttavuusarviointi (CIE)×
TieteenalaPublic PolicyKausaalipäättely
MenetelmäperheProcess / pipelineRegression model
Syntyvuosi20161970s–2000s
KehittäjäDevelopment and program-evaluation community; codified by Gertler et al. (World Bank)Heckman, Imbens, Rubin, and the program evaluation literature
TyyppiDesign framework for causal impact evaluationCausal inference / program evaluation
AlkuperäislähdeGertler, P. J., Martinez, S., Premand, P., Rawlings, L. B., & Vermeersch, C. M. J. (2016). Impact Evaluation in Practice (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: World Bank. ISBN: 9781464807794Heckman, J. J., & Vytlacil, E. J. (2007). Econometric evaluation of social programs, Part I: Causal models, structural models and econometric policy evaluation. Handbook of Econometrics, 6B, 4779-4874. DOI ↗
RinnakkaisnimetImpact Evaluation, Causal Impact Evaluation Design, Counterfactual Evaluation DesignCIE, counterfactual evaluation, counterfactual policy evaluation, impact evaluation
Liittyvät35
TiivistelmäImpact evaluation design is the upstream task of structuring an evaluation so that it can credibly attribute changes in outcomes to a policy or program rather than to other factors. Its defining concern is the counterfactual: what would have happened to participants in the absence of the intervention. Codified in resources such as the World Bank's Impact Evaluation in Practice, the design process selects an identification strategy — randomised assignment, or a quasi-experimental method such as difference-in-differences, regression discontinuity, instrumental variables or matching — that constructs a valid comparison and yields an unbiased estimate of the intervention's effect.Counterfactual Impact Evaluation is a family of causal methods that estimates the effect of an intervention by comparing what actually happened to participants with what would have happened had the intervention not taken place. Formalised in the Rubin Causal Model and extended by Heckman, Imbens and others, CIE underlies most modern program and policy evaluation practice.
ScholarGateAineisto
  1. v1
  2. 1 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED

Siirry hakuun Lataa diat

ScholarGateVertaile menetelmiä: Impact Evaluation Design · Counterfactual Impact Evaluation. Haettu 2026-06-24 osoitteesta https://scholargate.app/fi/compare