Vertaile menetelmiä

	Herfindahl Diversification Index	Diversification-Performance Analysis (Rumelt Categories)
Tieteenala	Strateginen johtaminen	Strateginen johtaminen
Menetelmäperhe	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Syntyvuosi	1979	1974
Kehittäjä	Alexis Jacquemin & Charles Berry; Krishna Palepu	Richard P. Rumelt; Krishna Palepu
Tyyppi	Continuous index of corporate diversification with related/unrelated decomposition	Classification-and-comparison pipeline relating diversification type to firm performance
Alkuperäislähde	Jacquemin, A. P., & Berry, C. H. (1979). Entropy measure of diversification and corporate growth. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 27(4), 359-369.	Rumelt, R. P. (1974). Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance. Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University. ISBN: 9780875841090
Rinnakkaisnimet	Entropy Measure of Diversification, Corporate Diversification Index, Jacquemin-Berry Entropy Index, Berry-Herfindahl Diversification Measure	Rumelt Diversification Category Analysis, Related vs Unrelated Diversification Analysis, Corporate Diversification Strategy Classification, Diversification Strategy-Performance Linkage
Liittyvät	3	3
Tiivistelmä	The Herfindahl diversification index and its entropy cousin turn a firm's spread across businesses into a single continuous number, with the decisive advantage that the entropy form can be cleanly split into related and unrelated diversification. The Herfindahl-based measure is one minus the sum of squared segment revenue shares; the entropy measure, introduced for diversification by Jacquemin and Berry in 1979, is the share-weighted sum of the logged inverse shares. Jacquemin and Berry's key contribution was showing that total entropy decomposes additively into within-industry-group (related) and between-group (unrelated) components. Palepu's 1985 study applied this entropy decomposition to strategic management, finding that related diversification was associated with superior profit growth and giving the field an objective, replicable alternative to categorical schemes.	Diversification-performance analysis asks whether the kind of diversification a firm pursues — staying focused, expanding into related businesses, or building an unrelated conglomerate — is systematically associated with how well the firm performs. The categorical version originates with Rumelt's 1974 Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance, which classified diversified firms by specialization and relatedness ratios into single-business, dominant-business, related, and unrelated types and found that related diversifiers tended to outperform unrelated ones. Palepu's 1985 study reframed diversification with the continuous Jacquemin-Berry entropy measure, again finding that related diversification was associated with superior profit growth, and showed how the index approach and Rumelt's categorical method can be combined to gain both objectivity and conceptual richness.