Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Joustava ja universaali kompromissianalyysi× | Kriteerivaikutuksen menetys -painotusmenetelmä× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Päätöksenteko | Päätöksenteko |
| Menetelmäperhe | MCDM | MCDM |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 2000 | 2016 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Raveh, A. | Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. |
| Tyyppi≠ | Weighted rank aggregation (Borda-type with rank-based weights) | Relative criterion-loss matrix weighting (Mirkin theorem based) |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Raveh, A. (2000). Co-plot: A graphic display method for geometrical representations of MCDM. European Journal of Operational Research DOI ↗ | Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making DOI ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | — | — |
| Liittyvät | 8 | 8 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | FUCA (Flexible and Universal Compromise Analysis) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Raveh, A. in 2000. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|